2 yrs - Translate

Its been five days of knowledge dispensation by the learned friends as the supreme court played the host of the teams defending and making appeals. The August 9th general elections results announced by the independent electoral and boundaries commission's chairperson Mr. Wafula Chebukation met with a lot of resistance from the azimio fraternity who claimed that the whole process was bungled. Led by their lawyer senior counsel James Agrey Orengo, the lawyers presented facts on how the process lacked what lawyer Willis Otieno termed as illegitimate. Among the evidence submitted to support the claims were the footprints left in the system as the intruders by the name Jose Carmago and CSilva tampered with the results. In one instance, lawyer Judy Soweto presented a form that had the name of Jose Carmago, which was met by rebellion from the defense team. That led to the access of form 34A directly from the portal. One of the claims of the petitioners was that Chebukati who is the chairperson of the IEBC was dictatorial and that he did not involve the other commissioners. As the day came to a close, the big question is, who will the verdict favor? In what somewhat dealt a blow to the defense team, the deputy chief justice Philomena Mwilu claimed that the supreme court worked as a team and that none had veto power. She however insisted that they worked under the leadership of their leader. Could this be an indication of how the outcome will be delivered on Monday? Will it be by vote or a unanimous decision? We guess that it will be a unanimous decision that will be proved wrong or right on Monday.

image

Install Palscity app